[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 1. Scheme code
>>
>> By default I'd add these under (ice-9) - but perhaps we should
>> consider something else? Please let me know if you have ideas.
>
> Maybe you could create a sub-directory, like `(ice-9 debugging)'?
Yes, good idea; I'll do that.
>> I should also say that I plan to document my Guile/Emacs interface as
>> the "official" or recommended one. If you are concerned about that,
>> please let me know asap.
>
> No, but we need to make sure it does not lack too many features compared
> with the implementation-neutral `scheme-mode' that comes with Emacs, and
No problem there, because my mode builds on top of scheme-mode.
> perhaps also compared to `quack.el'.
I haven't looked at quack for a while, but I will do so again soon.
> Overall, your plan looks very good to me. And I'm sure users will all
> find it very pleasant. :-)
I hope so. Thanks for your comments!
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
