Hi, Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I suppose you lose the aggregated tests counts at the end. If all >> tests work (which is presumably the normal case!) I guess it doesn't >> matter much either way. > > I wonder if those test counts are actually all that useful. I would > guess that most of the time you only care whether there was an error > or not. Beside the test counts (which I find useful), running all the scripts in a single process increases the chance of catching nasty bugs, as you noticed. ;-) So I think it makes sense to keep it as is. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
