Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The implementation works (it passes all of the tests they provide), > and I believe could completely replace Guile's existing eval.c > force/delay, but I wanted to know if anyone knew of a reason it > shouldn't.
I remember I thought it could go in C in the core nicely enough, or at least just extending `force' in the core and leaving the actual `eager' to the srfi module perhaps. I don't remember the details though, except it might be nice to lose the mutexes at the same time :), for speed and size. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-12/msg00050.html _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
