Hi, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >> The "i18n" character classification (listed in Section 4.3.2) is >> actually very broad: it considers at least all Latin, Greek and Cyrillic >> letters as part of the `alpha' character class. > > I think that makes sense. Just because some letters in a charset are > not normally used in a particular language is no real reason not to > have them considered letters. For the record, I started a discussion on `libc-locales' on this topic [0]. The issue at hand is whether character classification in locales should be (or "has to be", per some standard) language-independent. Thanks, Ludovic. [0] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-locales/2006-q3/msg00086.html _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
