Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well we have always had a strict stable policy until very recently, so > there should already be evidence one way or the other. I don't have > any numbers, but I am pretty sure (anecdotally) that we have had most > users sticking to the stable releases, and a smaller number going > unstable by using either CVS or the nightly snapshots. Good point. > If your main concern is getting new stuff out to the users who want to > experiment with it, I would have thought that making unstable releases > would meet that concern. Does it? As I asked before: is there some > way that we can specify when or how we would make an unstable release, > that would give you enough confidence about new stuff being made > available? Well, I think you're right, this should work well. But we should probably produce more unstable releases than for the 1.7 series. :-) As for the criteria for making an unstable release, I don't know. I guess the main criterion would be convenience. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
