On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 10:21 +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote: > I don't know if reduced or unreduced is a better representation. My > guess would be that gcds are so horrendously expensive that unreduced > is often what you want, if it's do-able. Reducing lazily sounds like > the best of both worlds, but as you point out would need multithread > protection.
This was discussed three years ago (my contribution to the discussion was http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2003-12/msg00013.html). Carl Witty _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
