Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> I would have thought that "argc-i" would be more reliable than "-1" >> here. > > I guess it's clearer to use one method or the other (not a mixture). > I changed it to below (with set-program-arguments added too).
Thanks, that looks good.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
