Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>   (define coverage-trap (make <entry-trap> #:behaviour cover-entry))
>
> You don't have to use goops to get a trap do you?

In terms of the low-level call outs from the evaluator, no.  In terms
of the infrastructure that (ice-9 debugging traps) builds on top of
that, yes.

Regards,
     Neil



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel

Reply via email to