Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> (define coverage-trap (make <entry-trap> #:behaviour cover-entry))
>
> You don't have to use goops to get a trap do you?
In terms of the low-level call outs from the evaluator, no. In terms
of the infrastructure that (ice-9 debugging traps) builds on top of
that, yes.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel