Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> (define coverage-trap (make <entry-trap> #:behaviour cover-entry)) > > You don't have to use goops to get a trap do you?
In terms of the low-level call outs from the evaluator, no. In terms of the infrastructure that (ice-9 debugging traps) builds on top of that, yes. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel