Mikael Djurfeldt escreveu: >> 3. Due to sharing of the filename cons, memory usage is slightly more >> than 4 SCMs per srcprop, down from 6 SCMs (2 for the smob cell, 4 for the >> struct) > > Hmm... Your filename optimization doesn't really work, does it? As > soon as someone sets a breakpoint, he gets it all over the place, or > did I miss something?
from what I could follow from the code, srcprops were mainly constructed in the reader. However, I would gladly remove that bit too, and simply go for cons-cell with struct pointer, but without the special memory pool. Neil, is that acceptable? > If we considered implementing source properties *now*, I would > probably agree. But the code is already there and I wonder if there > really is any gain of replacing it. It's a question of philosophy. IMO, at any time, the source code of a project should reflect how you would implement it "now" -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
