> From the recent experiments vs. Boehm GC, my impression was that > Guile's GC is already pretty good and that there is little scope for > improvement here.
Really? My (extremely unscientific) experiments were showing something like <10ms for C->Guile calls that didn't involve GC, and ~100ms for ones that did. > > * Not related to 1.9 itself, but maybe a cleanup / redesign of the web > > page, > > Yes, in principle. Needs someone to volunteer though. It might be worthwhile to put out a call to the GNU webmasters. Or just post an ad on Savannah -- I actually got several responses to something I posted looking for testers for SDOM, which has about zero name recognition. I bet lots of people would be interested in getting a chance to redesign Guile's page. > Yes, that would be nice. Except I'm not keen on following Microsoft > "standards". Java VM and/or Parrot (is that still happening?) would > be fine. Parrot had a new release two days ago. Whether they're still on peoples' minds (and whether they're still gonna host Perl6), I dunno. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
