Hello, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After reviewing what others have said on this, I'm inclined to agree > with this lazy-import approach. OK. > Agreed. Except that I think that we should "cvs remove" everything > that has been transferred to Git (once it is clear that the transfer > was successful). (Because there should not be two possible sources > for the guile-core files, that can only confuse people.) Hmm, I'd prefer adding a `THIS-REPOSITORY-IS-DEAD' marker, as Han-Wen suggested. We should also ask the Savannah hackers what other options are available to somehow "hide" the repository without actually deleting it. > I think I can go ahead with this at any time, can't I? In other > words: ticking this option won't automatically do anything bad to the > existing CVS infrastructure, will it? Yes, you can do it anytime, and as long as you don't "untick" the "CVS Repository" feature, nothing bad will happen. ;-) Thanks, Ludo'.
