Heya Ludovic, On Thu 24 Apr 2008 00:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> * GOOPS should define a with-accessors macro. > > Actually, I don't like it a lot (probably because I wouldn't mind adding > accessors to the global namespace). Do other CLOS-like systems have > something similar? So, I poked around in the archives for a good long while to find this answer that I knew was there ;-), but here 'tis, in this thread: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/guile/2000-04/msg00010.html Marius and Mikael's responses are the interesting ones IMO. >>> * GOOPS reference should be folded into Guile's reference, as it is now >> part of Guile. > > Not sure about it since it's quite a large document and it's easier to > search it when it's separate. You might be right. On the other hand, STKlos has it inline with its docs: http://www.stklos.org/Doc/html/index.html. And, it would be more clear at answering the question, "how do I do OO with Guile?". It would be a lot of work. But I disagree regarding the searchability argument, the names and indices don't overlap all that much. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
