Hi Neil, On Sat 03 Jan 2009 19:38, "Neil Jerram" <neiljer...@googlemail.com> writes:
> We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Here is my attempt to > pull that together a bit and flesh out what needs to be done. I think the plan is sensible. > 2. The "vm" branch. Once the review of "master" is done, we'll merge > "vm" into "master". I still need to finish documenting things, and tying up loose ends. I'm especially concerned about ABI and future compatibility. But this can be done in vm or master. > I'm wondering now if we should instead move the GH code into a > separate library, "libgh", but continue to provide this as part of the > Guile distribution. If we do this, the resulting "product" should have "deprecated" somewhere in its name. You wouldn't want people mistaking it for "high-level". My personal opinion is that we should move this stuff to C files that the user can include in her own project, and distribute those C files somewhere. But perhaps this is not feasible. > That's all for now. Any concerns or comments? Yay! :-) Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
