Hello! Your insights in reverse:
On Sat 21 Feb 2009 03:52, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes: > it might make sense to provide a pure-Scheme FFI inside Guile core > (perhaps just molding the current G-Wrap runtime library into shape). > Once you have that, you can create bindings without the need for any > "binding generation" step, hence doing away (in principle) the need > for G-Wrap altogether. I completely agree, this makes sense, and we should do this at some point this year. > I wonder how the advent of gobject-introspection will influence the > future of guile-gnome. I want to switch to it. But this is like a 200 hour project, and with less deployment than our existing solution. I don't anticipate working on this in 2009. Happy hacking, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
