Hi Neil :) Though I was not the person to whom the question was addressed, a comment :)
On Tue 31 Mar 2009 15:23, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes: > If you followed this kind of approach, note that it would also need > work - in addition to the Elisp/VM translation - to implement whatever > Emacs primitives the Elisp code relies on. That would make the > project as a whole less pure-language-translation, but (in my view) > more real and useful. I keep thinking that it should be possible to write some kind of C shim so that Guile could implement the Emacs C "API". That way we keep the existing C code working, we keep the fine-tuned implementations and semantics, and we can move on from "re-implementing" to "implementing" -- e.g. adding to Emacs instead of just reproducing it. Happy hacking, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
