On Wed 22 Apr 2009 17:53, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Julian Graham <jool...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hey, if we're open to extending the module system, then sure -- that >> would certainly make for a cleaner, more efficient implementation. >> That's got my vote.
Mine too :) > The trick is to extend it in a backward-compatible way as much as > possible. But now that we have hygiene and `use-syntax' has been > sort-of phased out (Andy?), that should be doable. use-syntax deprecation is coming soon, perhaps tonight. > Perhaps we could create a branch so that you could experiment things? What would it have? Module versions? We should probably take advantage of the occasion to separate the variable namespace from the module namespace. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
