Hey, Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes:
> So, same patches, different order, better testing. Just try to git > er done. OK, thanks for the explanation. > (Did I ever mention this backtrace tree > pic? http://www.lonelycactus.com/uploaded_images/test[1]-765536.PNG > It shows that for all the scripts the test suite, all of the calls to > low-level read and write pass through those two functions.) Nice. I suppose you had breakpoints in GDB, captured the output of "bt", frobbed it and fed it to `dot'? > I have changed my opinion on one issue. I don't believe that Guile > ports should have a specific encoding: they should just use the > locale. This is just pragmatism. Guile ports and the default reader > are annoying things to hack. I am loathe to touch them more than is > necessary. > > The R6RS ports have the nice transcoder idea. It might be more fun to > push port-specific encodings to that library. Are you saying that we'd have an implementation of the R6 port API that DTRT, whereas Guile's current API would remain encoding-oblivious? Thanks! Ludo'.
![http://www.lonelycactus.com/uploaded_images/test[1]-765536.PNG](http://www.lonelycactus.com/uploaded_images/test[1]-765536.PNG ){kind=link}