Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes:
> Another option of course is to not classify data types by "simple" or
> "compound", but some division is necessary.
>
> Perhaps our master wordsmith Baron von Jerram has a perspective :)
Huh? Where did that `Baron' come from?
But anyway... I don't have a strong opinion here, but
- I think that bytevectors go with other kinds of vectors more closely
than they go with strings
- I think we could benefit from discarding the Simple vs Compound
division - i.e. combine everything into a single `Data Types'
section. `Pairs' could be much nearer the top of the combined list
than it is now.
Regards,
Neil
