[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi Neil,
Hi Ludo! > Neil Jerram <[email protected]> writes: > >> Wow, that's pretty cool! So your patches are actually in GDB now, are >> they? > > Yes, but as I said, they're not too useful as it stands. I don't really understand why you say that. They look useful to me. >> Notwithstanding, it looks like my conclusion that we don't need >> GDB_INTERFACE and GDB_INTERFACE_INIT in guile.c is still correct - can >> you confirm that? > > I think so. Thanks. >> (In other words, instead of using some kind of registration API, I >> guess that GDB either links to libguile, or looks up the gdb_* >> functions that it needs dynamically, or has an independent copy of the >> libguile code that it needs to do printing. Is that right?) > > Currently, it just calls `gdb_print ()' et al. in the inferior process. > Eventually, it should use its own printers, so that it can work without > interfering the process being debugged, work on core files, etc. Ah yes, of course, GDB must be able to do that... Regards, Neil
