Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > Oh no, I haven't seen a new one either. I was just going to take a look > at the old one again and see how much work it needed -- because it's not > fair to Daniel to keep his work in limbo, IMO.
True - but I thought Mark's patch was an orthogonal optimisation, and
hence that Daniel's work shouldn't depend on it. Is that wrong?
Neil
