Hi,

Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:

> It's a shame that GCC has not been able to support LLVM's level of
> innovation,

I don’t think innovation is the problem (did you read the 4.5 release
notes?).  However, it’s been too much of a monolithic compiler, unlike
LLVM, although plug-ins will now improve the situation.

Ludo’.



Reply via email to