On Wed 21 Apr 2010 10:40, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > FWIW I’d really prefer if it could work with SRFI-9 (which is purely > syntactic, so there’s no run-time record type descriptor) rather than > with Guile’s records (as above).
There is a run-time rtd, of sorts; it is the struct-vtable. There would be no penalty making Guile's records interoperable with SRFI-9 records. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
