Hello!

No Itisnt <theseaisinh...@gmail.com> writes:

> One thing I'm missing, and maybe I just didn't see it, is a way to
> define custom printers for SRFI-9 records.

I agree that it’s generally useful, but I think SRFI modules should not
diverge from the spec, or when they do, make it separate, as was done
with (srfi srfi-4 gnu).

What do you think?

Thanks,
Ludo’.


Reply via email to