On Mon 12 Jul 2010 10:07, Thien-Thi Nguyen <t...@gnuvola.org> writes:
> () l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > () Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:17:07 +0200 > > ‘system’ may be more risky in that respect. ‘guile’ would have been a > better choice, but I’m afraid it’s too late (in theory it isn’t, but...). > > Thoughts? > > Perhaps we can start discussing "directory aliases", a feature whereby > (foo bar baz) can be specified to resolve (perhaps in multiple steps) > to (actual baz). We alias only directories, not full module names, to > avoid having to deal with ‘%load-extensions’. There are also submodule binders, in git guile, that can be used to implement this. > - Module name directory part (of aliases, of fully-resolved) > must be non-empty? > > - Will dealing with ‘%load-extensions’ be in the future plans? > > - Where/how to store alias info. Can this mechanism be unified > with one for resolved modules (e.g., Guile 1.4.x module catalogs)? I don't understand the problem solved by these things; I would need more details to comment, I think. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
