Hi, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed 21 Jul 2010 01:17, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >>>> Indeed, if ‘vhash-assoc’ et al. are changed to return a vhash instead of >>>> a pair >>> >>> Thinking more about it, I think I’d rather keep ‘vhash-assoc’ & co. as >>> they are, and add ‘vhash-assoc*’ & co., which would return a vhash. >> >> Commit 927bf5e8cc0af9515797ebab6d9ba162bef23c2a is roughly the original >> patch. > > Doesn't that impose an allocation penalty on vhash-assoc? No, it remains as before. The new ‘vhash-fold*’ does not allocate either. Thanks, Ludo’.
