Hey! Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue 20 Jul 2010 18:35, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> I would prefer not to enshrine a "regular / debug" split again though. I >>> guess that's what really bothers me. It's especially egregious if you >>> can't switch at runtime. >> >> The split survived! :-) >> >> $ guile -c 'sdf' >> ERROR: In procedure catch-closure: >> ERROR: Unbound variable: sdf >> >> $ guile --debug -c 'sdf' >> Backtrace: > [...] > > Hehe. That, to me, is a bug ;-) What do you think about always giving > backtraces for uncaught errors? I’m all for it! Ludo’.
