Hi, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ta...@spray.se> writes:
>> > For setting up the error reporting I used a pdf >> > describing the syntax-parse macro >> > >> > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/scheme/pubs/icfp10-cf.pdf >> >> Yeah, that seems like an improvement in terms of error detection and >> error reporting (better than “source expression failed to match any >> pattern”...). >> >> However, I don’t like the aesthetics: keywords, and, worse, type >> annotations embedded in identifiers. > > The syntax can be fixed, any ideas? No, but I think that having a consensual syntax among Schemers may be more sustainable than rolling our own macro system. :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
