Hi Andreas! Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes: >> >>> +...@c This subsection is based on the specification of SRFI-27, which has >>> +...@c the following license: >>> + >>> +...@c Copyright (C) Sebastian Egner (2002). All Rights Reserved. >> >> Perhaps this should appear in the text, perhaps with a link to the >> license or something? >> > Indeed, I will put something along these lines into the text, including > a link to the original specification (which includes the license text at > its end). Expect a patch sometime soon. Great. > A slightly related question: I'm preparing patches to add SRFI 42 and > 67. I don't know if I'll find the time and motivation to also provide a > texinfo version of their specifications (and, contrary to SRFI 27, these > would essentially be literal transcriptions). Would patches which just > add links to the documents at http://srfi.schemers.org/ into the manual > at the appropriate places be acceptable as well? Currently only SRFI-34 lacks documentation. Personally I find it handy to have complete, user-oriented SRFI documentation in the manual, but I reckon that writing it is tedious. Still, some sort of a transcription would be nice (though for SRFI-42, for example, the second part of the abstract and the rationale don’t belong in Guile’s manual), but having the code is nice too, so... Thanks, Ludo’.
