Hi! Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> On Sat 29 Jan 2011 23:54, Hans Aberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: > >> On 29 Jan 2011, at 21:53, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >>>> I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement >>>> Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. ... >> >>> I think comp.lang.scheme is already a good place for this. You >>> quickly >>> get feedback and many implementors seem to participate in it. >> >> The newsgroup did not seem very active. Is it still important? > > There are also lists related to standardization: > r6rs-disc...@lists.r6rs.org, and scheme-repo...@scheme-reports.org. The “R7RS” lists are accessible read-only via Gmane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.reports http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.reports.wg1 http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.reports.wg2 It’s read-only because these are Google groups, which require a Google account to post, I think, and the list admins insisted on allowing only member postings... > There are SRFI lists as well, I think. Only per-SRFI, though. > The scheme-reports list seems to always end up in my spam box for some > reason, though. I think I tried like three times to subscribe to it, > but never got the confirmation mails, becaus of some problem with that > list. Still I think it is the most active list on the standardization > front. That’s because it takes a lot of talk to reinvent the wheel! :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
