Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes:
> I did apply it, but it made the test cases start to fail, because
> numbers.test is loaded after ecmascript.test, and:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,L ecmascript
> Happy hacking with ECMAScript! To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
> ecmascript@(guile-user)> true * true;
> $1 = 1
> ecmascript@(guile-user)> ,L scheme
> Happy hacking with Scheme! To switch back, type `,L ecmascript'.
> scheme@(guile-user)> (* #t #t)
> $2 = 1
How could changes in `expt' possibly affect (true * true) or (* #t #t)?
I don't understand what this has to do with my patch.
Mark
