Hello, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> On Tue 08 Feb 2011 00:13, Göran Weinholt <go...@weinholt.se> writes: > >> I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to have these reader >> options by associated with each port. > > Probably, yes. Would be a larger refactor, though. I think ports and reader syntax are orthogonal. Instead I’m in favor of multiple ‘read’ procedures and using the ‘current-reader’ fluid to make sure the current reader is inherited. Thanks, Ludo’.
