l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> For 2.0, what about AC_CHECK_LIB ‘mpz_rootrem’, and provide a
> replacement when it’s not available?  [...]

Sounds reasonable.

> In ‘master’ you can of course require 4.2 and clean things up as you see
> fit.  :-)

Great, thanks! :)

     Mark

Reply via email to