On Tue 15 Mar 2011 16:46, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes: > I'd also like to point out that the R6RS is the only relevant standard > that mandates O(1) string accessors. The R5RS did not require this, and > WG1 for the R7RS has already voted against this requirement. > > http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ticket/27
Only tangentially related to the question under discussion, but I find this a bit baffling. I found http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/StringRepresentations, but it's a lot of original work (record1 ??), and doesn't lead to any conclusions. http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/WG1Ballot1Results lists no rationales. Grr. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
