Greets :) On Sun 27 Mar 2011 17:11, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Internally we should still inline scm_cell & co., though; that can be > done without exposing <gc/gc.h> in public headers I guess. (Actually, > we should inline scm_cons, too, internally.) Agreed. >>> A meta-comment: can we agree to take more time to discuss this sort of >>> things? I’ll try to be responsive, and the earth won’t stop spinning if >>> the fix waits a couple of days. ;-) >> >> Sure. Sorry for the precipitous action. That said, this bug has been >> open since September: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32436 > > Oh indeed, I hadn’t realized there’s a connection; still... Do you have any thoughts on that bug, or the recent threads.c patches? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
