Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > Heya :) > > On Mon 11 Apr 2011 22:01, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >>> I don't know if this is important, as R6RS users probably have lots of >>> other carnage to deal with, but it is strictly an ABI break. >> >> Well well, they’ll need to recompile. My feeling is that it’s >> acceptable, but I don’t have a strong opinion. > > In this case it probably is, but we don't really know what users there > are. But let's please keep this general issue in mind in the future. > Agreed. I'm reluctant to using macros as a performance hack (e.g., define-inlinable) -- it just feels wrong, but sometimes performance numbers are seductive...
Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
