Hey! Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis:
> On Wed 08 Jun 2011 23:05, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> "Andy Wingo" <wi...@pobox.com> skribis: >> >>> "Return a new future for THUNK. Execution may start at any point >>> concurrently, or it can start at the time when the returned future is >>> touched." >>> + (create-workers!) >> >> Wouldn't it be more efficient to instead do: >> >> (if (null? %workers) >> (%create-workers!)) >> >> Once the workers are created, that would leave 0 function calls. > > Possibly, but isn't there a race condition if you do that though? Oops, you’re right, sorry. Thanks, Ludo’.
