I just expressed "I think group capturing is useful and someone didn't think that's true". If this is not what your last mail mean, I think it's better to ignore it.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Marijn <hk...@gentoo.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 30-12-11 11:56, Nala Ginrut wrote: > > Hmm, interesting! I must confess I'm not familiar with Racket, but > > I think the aim of Guile contains practicality. > > Not sure what you're trying to imply here or to which of my points > you're responding. > > > So I think regex-lib of Guile does this at least. Anyway, I believe > > an implementation should do its best to provide any useful > > mechanism for the user. Or it won't be popular anymore. When I talk > > about "useful", I mean "it brings the user convenient", not "the > > developer think it's useful". > > Idem ditto. > > > Just my mumble, no any offense. Thank you for telling us this > > issue. ;-) > > Marijn > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk79pQ8ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wMewCgml8guLqLK2fx7NWHa1JQ7pQ9 > wrIAoLkHJnNF8nkWWMM4EKkyBEyffZEQ > =1IRy > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
