OK, I'll put this proc in my own lib since there's no regexp-lib but a
regexp-core in Guile. Anyway, it's almost completed now. One may copy the
final version if needed.

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.homelinux.net>wrote:

> Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Well, I see.
> > So the previous discussion didn't make this proc put into Guile?
> > Now that so many people interested in this topic.
>
> I'm afraid I can't recall what happened following that thread.
>
> What feels important to me, though, is the elegance of the overall API.
> There are already _some_ regex-related APIs in the core Guile library
> (ice-9 regex) and I would guess that there are many many possible
> variations of these and other string + regex processing APIs that one
> might propose.  Also we've now demonstrated that regex-split can be
> implemented, on top of the existing library, with only a few lines of
> code.  Therefore I'd say (speaking only as an observer) that you need to
> make a case for how your regex-split beautifully complements what's
> already there in (ice-9 regex), or alternatively for replacing (ice-9
> regex) with a more beautiful set of operations including regex-split.
>
> Alternatively^2, you could package regex-split outside the core library,
> as a test case for the guild hall.  Then it doesn't need to be justified
> in relation to (ice-9 regex), it can just be a convenient module that
> provides a more Python-like API.
>
> Regards,
>     Neil
>

Reply via email to