> From: Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org>
>> scm_display
>
> A matter of adding it as a @deffnx below ‘display’ under “Scheme Write”.
>
>> scm_puts
>
> This and scm_putc should be documented, yes.
>
>> scm_new_port_table_entry
>
> Actually the whole port subsystem is undocumented. :-( So yes, would
> be great to document.
OK. I'll try to come up with a patch for the above 3.
>
>> scm_sym2var
>
> It’s public for historical reason, but I personally don’t like it,
> because it has a stupid name and complex semantics. ;-)
>
> Depending on what you’re doing, you may be able to use one of the scm_c_
> functions in modules.h. WDYT?
It always bothered me, though, that the many scm_c_lookup and
scm_c_{public,private}_* procedures have so many non-local exits.
It does seem like a lot of C code is necessary just to check if a
variable is there or not, since you have to catch all the exceptions.
>
> Anyway, patches appreciated on the doc front!
I'll see what I can do.
