Hi, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis:
>> What about calling it ‘current-file-name’ instead? > > > (apropos "filename") > (guile): set-module-filename! #<procedure 1546f20 at > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1712:2 (module val)> > (guile): module-filename #<procedure 1546fa0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1712:2 > (module)> > (guile): current-filename > (guile): set-port-filename! #<procedure set-port-filename! (_ _)> > (guile): port-filename #<procedure port-filename (_)> > (ice-9 readline): filename-completion-function #<procedure > filename-completion-function (_ _)> > > (apropos "file-name") > > > > Though I am responsible for three of those, I think I was just following > established convention. Hmm, OK then. Ludo’.
