On Wed 01 Feb 2012 07:20, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes: > Should we add 'scm_to_pointer'? For most other accessors, the trend > seems to be to discourage use of C macros and move people over to C > functions instead. With that in mind, it seems inconsistent to have > people using SCM_POINTER_VALUE for lack of a C function to do this job. > > What do you think?
Sounds like a great idea to me. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
