Hello, > Hmm. I don't know if this is what you meant, but it occurs to me that > as I've currently implemented them, both (cond (else (define x 5) x)) > and (case 1 (else (define x 5) x)) are allowed. I'll have to make sure > that those raise errors. I guess that means I'll have to insert a '#f' > like I did for local-eval. Do you see a better way?
This makes me think that we should have a macro called expression-context for putting things in expression context. It's not that it's hard to insert #f, but that makes the source code less clear unless people know why a random `#f' would appear in the code. What does everyone else think? Noah
