Hi David, Sorry for the late reply.
David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> skribis: > Previous attempts have mostly exploded around the problem that we have > something like > > (for-each ly:load init-scheme-files) > > in our lily.scm file, and the auto-compiler attempts to compile all of > those files independently as far as I understand. Unfortunately, some > of them contain macro definitions that other files rely on. The order in which files get compiled does not matter; the semantics of programs do not depend on whether code is being bytecode-interpreted or just interpreted by (ice-9 eval). The only reason you might want to compile files in topological order is performance. Does that answer your question? Thanks, Ludo’.
