Hi! Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis:
> I went ahead and pushed this branch to stable-2.0. We can roll it out > again if it causes problems. Cool, thanks! > I spent some time poking at vlists and ended up squeezing out a little > bit of performance. Any figures? > I ended up allocating the hash table data inline to the content > vector, after some care looking at what the optimizer was doing, and > that ended up being a win. There are a couple of smaller wins there > too. Compilation is still a bit slower though. Grrr. Sounds like nice work. Did you try fiddling with ‘block-growth-factor’, as suggested earlier? Thanks, Ludo’.
