Howdy, On Sun 06 May 2012 12:14, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> The problem is that the auto-generated “Standard Library” section looks > very poor in comparison to the rest of the manual. So we should really > try hard to write good doc by hands for these, and come up with a handy > structure (instead of one node per module, all under “Standard > Library”). I agree. I used to think that auto-generation would work as well or better than .texi files, but I think time has definitely proved me wrong, and the GCS right (http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Doc-Strings-and-Manuals.html). The right thing to do is to rework the "Standard Library" documentation into .texi files. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
