Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: >>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>>> I’ll let you see whether/how you can borrow from this in your code, if >>>> that’s fine with you. >>> >>> Okay, will do. >> >> Any progress on this? ;-) > > I apologize for dropping on the ball on this. The primary concern I > have with my current approach is that 'define-tagged-inlinable' adds > several more huge bloated syntax-objects to the getter macros. Of > course, as usual, this bloat will never be used, but everyone must pay > for 'datum->syntax' whether they use it or not :-( Are you concerned about the size of ‘srfi-9.go’, or is there some other issue at stake? While I agree that bloating .go files is not satisfying, I would not consider it a showstopper here. I suppose the only way to use fewer syntax objects would be to use a specialize variant of ‘define-tagged-inlinable’, no? That would make the code less elegant. >> I’m happy to help with updating the docs, for instance, if you want. > > That would be very helpful, thanks! OK, I’ll do that when the code is checked in. Thanks, Ludo’.
