If it's semi-standard, we should probably support it too.
However, a Google search reveals the following other uses of .sls:
- A list of images for a slideshow ("sls" stands for "slideshow script")
- The backup files for some program callled Litespeed
- ScriptLab Scripts (seems to be an image generation program)
- Configuration files for the Salt infrastructure management tool
So we probably shouldn't use it ourselves. (Plus, I personally think it's
uglier than .scm, but that's not a strong argument.)
Noah
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Any objections to adding ".guile.sls" and ".sls" to Guile's default
> %load-extensions? Ian Price tells me that this naming convention is
> commonly followed for R6RS libraries and implementations, e.g. Racket,
> Mosh, Ikarus, and Ypsilon. It would facilitate easy use of R6RS
> libraries without having to rename the files. I'm inclined to go along.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Mark
>
>
>
