Hi! Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
> FWIW, I agree with Andy that it would be good to support texinfo markup > in docstrings. At present, the docstrings for procedures implemented in > C are much nicer looking than the Scheme ones. Hmm, they just look the same since they are already rendered. > I've been sad to see the recent patches that strip texinfo markup from > docstrings. That's going in the wrong direction, IMO. That’s going in the direction of having docstrings usable /now/, where no rendering occurs. > Regarding 'procedure-documentation', I think it should return the > rendered version, just like it does for procedures defined in C. Yes, probably. One problem to keep in mind is that (texinfo ...) is only able to render a small subset of Texinfo. That’s probably OK for docstrings, though. Ludo’.
