Hi, On Thu 17 Jan 2013 21:51, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all, I wanted to resurrect the idea of a syntactic closure. I did > some thinking and Meta: I seem to be receiving your mails with this really strange line wrapping. It's been this way for a while, and it makes it difficult to read your mails. Would you mind taking a look at your editor and setting the fill column to 72 characters? Thanks :) > 2. The idea is to capture the syntactic environment in template1 ... and > call the > closure with the captured syntactic elements and insert the > resulting syntax into > . Into what? > (read-hash-extend #\_ syntax-closure-reader) Have you tried having your srfi-72 module export a binding for unsyntax? > The question for me is how to treat this code, as a library of it's > own supporting e.g. racket and guile and other schemes with the > syntax case system, or should we try to make this reader extension as > nice as possible and incorporate the code in guile. Is #_ ok? do you > have any other suggestion? I would prefer not to include it in the core; in my ignorance I do not see the need, especially if it can be implemented in a library. Of course it may make sense to bundle a srfi-72 implementation with guile, but ideally we can do so without affecting the core. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
