BTW. Of cause if you read the doc's for srfi-72 you will see a whole different machinery that brings many features, they explicitly states 6 facts in the abstract for which I adress one in the code.
On the other hand when they try to sell it it they just uses examples for the case for witch I try to implement a solution for. So in this light I would say that I practically cover 90% of srfi-72 intention. But from a theoretical standpoint I would just say 10%. /Stefan On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> wrote: > Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> writes: >> Let's call it guile-srfi-72, In the end it is a srfi-72 simulator [...] > > I'm pretty sure this is also false. One of the main points of SRFI-72 > is the improved hygiene algorithm, which is quite different than psyntax > in its details. Unless I'm mistaken, you have picked out only one small > aspect of SRFI-72 that happens to be relevant to what you're doing. > > Therefore, I don't think it should be called SRFI-72 either. > > Mark
